Comments on: 油脂浸洗鸡尾酒工艺在工业上的应用 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale 发布博客 Mon, 27 Oct 2025 07:14:14 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: 育新 陈 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-45963 育新 陈 Mon, 27 Oct 2025 07:14:14 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=233751#comment-45963 In reply to <a href="//www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-45893">云天 庞</a>. 您好,暂时没有包含相间传质的分离型两相流案例,或许您可以参考基于分散型两相流的液-液萃取案例(对应本文后半部分)://www.denkrieger.com/model/liquidliquid-extraction-114131

In reply to 云天 庞.

您好,暂时没有包含相间传质的分离型两相流案例,或许您可以参考基于分散型两相流的液-液萃取案例(对应本文后半部分)://www.denkrieger.com/model/liquidliquid-extraction-114131

By: 云天 庞 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-45893 云天 庞 Fri, 24 Oct 2025 05:40:42 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=233751#comment-45893 In reply to <a href="//www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-44703">Jun Leng</a>. 但这个案例的分离式两相流并不包含相间传质

In reply to Jun Leng.

但这个案例的分离式两相流并不包含相间传质

By: Jun Leng //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-44703 Jun Leng Thu, 28 Aug 2025 07:27:41 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=233751#comment-44703 In reply to <a href="//www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-44573">云天 庞</a>. 您好,可参考以下官网案例://www.denkrieger.com/model/droplet-rising-through-a-suspension-90401

In reply to 云天 庞.

您好,可参考以下官网案例://www.denkrieger.com/model/droplet-rising-through-a-suspension-90401

By: 云天 庞 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-44573 云天 庞 Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:02:45 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=233751#comment-44573 请问有本文中这个 乙醇中上升油滴的案例么

请问有本文中这个
乙醇中上升油滴的案例么

By: Zhiyong Guo //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-17983 Zhiyong Guo Thu, 07 Jul 2022 01:29:33 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=233751#comment-17983 In reply to <a href="//www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-5891">Ying (Grace) Xu</a>. Excuse me, do you have this model?

In reply to Ying (Grace) Xu.

Excuse me, do you have this model?

By: Ying (Grace) Xu //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-5891 Ying (Grace) Xu Fri, 20 Nov 2020 02:44:49 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=233751#comment-5891 In reply to <a href="//www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-5862">业昌 郭</a>. Dear 业昌 When using the two-phase flow moving mesh interface, then the partition coefficient is used in the boundary conditions. For the concentration for a solute in one phase, e.g. phase 1, becomes a function of the concentration of the same solute in phase 2: c1 = f(c2) For the equation of the solute in phase 2, you can instead use the fact that the flux has to be continuous over the phase boundary: flux(c1)*n1 = - flux(c2)*n2, where n1 and n2 are the normal outwards vector at the boundary for the respective phase. The principle is demonstrated for a membrane in this model, see specifically slide 5 in the PowerPoint file: https://www.comsol.com/model/separation-through-dialysis-258 For a dispersed flow model, this becomes more complicated to formulate but on the other hand it is also easier to solve. You then need to have an expression for the mass transfer coefficient at the phase boundary, usually only in the phase where transport is rate determining. This may also yield an additional concentration variable at the phase boundary for each phase and each solute. Then you use the same principle as above but for the homogenized reaction term instead, i.e. for one solute equation you use the equilibrium condition at the boundary and for the other you use the mass transport coefficient to get an equal reaction but with opposite sign in each point in space for the two phases. We will create a few example models with this feature exemplified during the year. Best regards, Ed

In reply to 业昌 郭.

Dear 业昌

When using the two-phase flow moving mesh interface, then the partition coefficient is used in the boundary conditions. For the concentration for a solute in one phase, e.g. phase 1, becomes a function of the concentration of the same solute in phase 2:
c1 = f(c2)
For the equation of the solute in phase 2, you can instead use the fact that the flux has to be continuous over the phase boundary:
flux(c1)*n1 = – flux(c2)*n2, where n1 and n2 are the normal outwards vector at the boundary for the respective phase. The principle is demonstrated for a membrane in this model, see specifically slide 5 in the PowerPoint file:
https://www.comsol.com/model/separation-through-dialysis-258

For a dispersed flow model, this becomes more complicated to formulate but on the other hand it is also easier to solve. You then need to have an expression for the mass transfer coefficient at the phase boundary, usually only in the phase where transport is rate determining. This may also yield an additional concentration variable at the phase boundary for each phase and each solute. Then you use the same principle as above but for the homogenized reaction term instead, i.e. for one solute equation you use the equilibrium condition at the boundary and for the other you use the mass transport coefficient to get an equal reaction but with opposite sign in each point in space for the two phases. We will create a few example models with this feature exemplified during the year.

Best regards,
Ed

By: 业昌 郭 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/fat-washing-cocktails-on-an-industrial-scale/#comment-5862 业昌 郭 Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:54:13 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=233751#comment-5862 Could you please introduce how to deal with the partition coefficient? Thank you very much

Could you please introduce how to deal with the partition coefficient? Thank you very much

Baidu
map