Discussion ClosedThis discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one,click here.
Lagrange multiplier in axial symmetry
Posted 2017年1月11日 GMT+1 18:46Heat Transfer & Phase Change, Geometry, MeshVersion 5.22 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hey Guys,
i am modelling a moving boundary interface (Stefan Problem), using the Lagrange multiplier T_lm from heat transfer analysis for prescribed normal mesh velocity in the deformed geometry physics.
The model is almost identical to the 2D Tin melting front example from Comsol library:
www.comsol.com/model/tin-melting-front-6234
except that I work in axial symmetry and my interface is perpendicular to the axis of symmetry.
When I solve, the Lagrange multiplier T_lm is always zero at r=0. I guess I am missing something fundamental here ? Does anyone have a hint for me ?
Thank you and Regards
--
______
Flanell
i am modelling a moving boundary interface (Stefan Problem), using the Lagrange multiplier T_lm from heat transfer analysis for prescribed normal mesh velocity in the deformed geometry physics.
The model is almost identical to the 2D Tin melting front example from Comsol library:
www.comsol.com/model/tin-melting-front-6234
except that I work in axial symmetry and my interface is perpendicular to the axis of symmetry.
When I solve, the Lagrange multiplier T_lm is always zero at r=0. I guess I am missing something fundamental here ? Does anyone have a hint for me ?
Thank you and Regards
--
______
Flanell
2 Replies
Last Post 2017年4月27日 GMT+2 11:40
Hello Flanell
Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.
If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
Hi Flanell,
In fact, the Lagrange multiplier T_lm should be in W/m2, but for symetric problems is in W/m. you should easily just use: T_lm [W/m^2]/(rho_Si*DelH*r*pi) instead of T_lm [W/m^2]/(rho_Si*DelH). In this case the Lagrange multiplier transfer from "per radius" to "per area (Pi*r*r*)"
In fact, the Lagrange multiplier T_lm should be in W/m2, but for symetric problems is in W/m. you should easily just use: T_lm [W/m^2]/(rho_Si*DelH*r*pi) instead of T_lm [W/m^2]/(rho_Si*DelH). In this case the Lagrange multiplier transfer from "per radius" to "per area (Pi*r*r*)"
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
Hi Amir,
thanks alot!
I figured it out alreday and it works like you said
Best
--
______
Flanell
thanks alot!
I figured it out alreday and it works like you said
Best
--
______
Flanell